Lamp avatar
Click Me Too to show your support for this idea, and we’ll keep you updated on its progress.
Fiona Tang

45 neighbors want ridesharing to keep on keeping on in San Francisco.

Ride-sharing companies, Uber, Lyft and Sidecar were just fined by the California Public Utilities Commission. I, for one, don't want to see these services disappear, only to be left with our regular taxis.

What else can we do to support-ride-sharing-services?

Supporters All

Bridget
Alan Joseph Williams
Stanford Rosenthal
Luke Bornheimer
Justin Street
Laura Gluhanich
Edward
Evan Goldin
Eckhart Beatty
Loic
D. Keith Robinson
Vincent Turner
Laura Brunow Miner
Meli
Emily Castor
Sally Kuchar
340 views

Location

How can you help?

Lamp avatar
Sign in or sign up to share ideas and take action.
Dan
Thumb4fe29b278c9c336a5e0e702bbda0c7de

California bill would green-light on-demand car pools

A long-standing state law aimed at limos and taxis bars charging differing rates for shared rides. [...] in September, the California Public Utilities Commission notified them that the paid car pools violate state law. CPUC officials said they simply wanted to spur them to alert the Legislature that the code needed to be amended. “We remain...

www.sfgate.com/business/articl...

Share Link
Posted Apr 23, 2015
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Dan

"Ride-sharing companies like Lyft, Sidecar and UberX will have to obtain state licenses and put their drivers through training under rules passed Thursday by state regulators.

The California Public Utilities Commission approved 28 regulations that are designed to ensure the safety of a relatively new and increasingly popular transportation service in which riders and drivers connect through smartphone apps."

www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article...

Thumb3839d29f61fb264d65d079ba02c6c1c1

State adopts regs for Ride-share services

The California Public Utilities Commission approved 28 regulations that are designed to ensure the safety of a relatively new and increasingly popular transportation service in which riders and drivers connect through smartphone apps. The new rules require ride-sharing companies to hold minimum levels of insurance, run background checks on...

www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article...

Share Link
Posted Sep 19, 2013
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Tom K.

A big win!

"Today, we’re happy to share that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) announced a proposed decision that supports the continued legal operation of Lyft throughout the state of California. With the guidelines outlined in the proposed decision, the CPUC has set a new standard for safety in transportation while supporting innovation that makes cities safer, more affordable and better connected."

blog.lyft.me/post/56921397560/...

Thumb798e169b8565645d87bc5569cb7b7372

CPUC Proposes New Category to Include Lyft

Today, we’re happy to share that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) announced a proposed decision that supports the continued legal operation of Lyft throughout the state of California....

blog.lyft.me/post/56921397560/...

Share
1
Posted Jul 31, 2013
Stanford Rosenthal
Stanford Rosenthal
Jul 31, 2013

Took this picture yesterday – would be a good cover photo for this idea :) instagram.com/p/cahGIfI7AP/

Posted by Stanford Rosenthal on Jul 31, 2013
Tom K.
Tom K.
Jul 31, 2013

That is UNREAL, but becoming more and typical in SF. Adding it as the photo!

Posted by Tom K. on Jul 31, 2013
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Dan

Progress from Sidecar's blog today: "Today marks a big victory for rideshare. We’ve reached an agreement with the California Pacific Utilities Commission (CPUC) that supports Sidecar’s continued legal operation in California and removes all citations and fines imposed against our company.

This agreement with the CPUC is seven months in the making. Even though the CPUC and Sidecar have shared goals for protecting safety and encouraging innovation, we felt it was important to wait to sign this agreement until it allowed us to work together while preserving the principles of rideshare. SideCar is a technology platform that enables peer-to-peer ridesharing and should not be regulated as if it’s operating a dispatch transportation service. This agreement makes this important distinction and also makes it clear that the CPUC does not have jurisdiction over our company."

blog.side.cr/2013/05/24/ridesh...

Share Link
Posted May 28, 2013
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Tom K.

Love this story:

"Born during the Panama-Pacific International Expo to ferry around the glut of attendees and workers in town to see San Francisco's recovery from the 1906 earthquake — at a time when there were private streetcar lines competing with what would become Muni — jitneys quickly became a popular way to commute.

Private automobiles were rare in those days, so these shared-ride services reached a varied demographic. In the 1910s, there were more than 1,400 jitneys operating in the city, according to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. By comparison, there are 1,800 licensed taxis in the city today (and an unknown number of Ubers and Lyfts).

As the decades passed, more and more options for getting around became available, including commuting solo by automobile and an expanded Muni. After BART entered service in the early 1970s, jitney use sharply declined, in part because no new permits were being issued, but mostly because city regulations requiring jitneys to charge fares equal or greater to public transit removed patrons' incentives. Why ride a jitney when the bus costs the same?"

www.sfweekly.com/sanfrancisco/...

Thumb39fb804142ee7a1d732154b54259725e

The Last Ride of the Jitney

After 44 years of regular service, San Francisco's last jitney has sat idly on a SoMa street corner for weeks. Every day since the Nixon...

www.sfweekly.com/sanfrancisco/...

Share Link
1
Posted Mar 16, 2016
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Dan

The SFMTA is voting on new restrictions for ridesharing on Market Street. From Uber's blog:

"As the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) revisits its rules for the types of vehicles allowed on Market Street — your ability to take an Uber from Market Street is at risk — and we need you to speak up in support of ridesharing services like Uber.

NEW SFMTA RESTRICTIONS THAT WILL IMPACT YOU:

→ Taxis on Market Street - APPROVED
→ Buses on Market Street - APPROVED
→ Ridesharing on Market Street - DENIED"

petition.uber.org/sf/

Thumbb89bd912fb0828d8057b566310d4bf01

Allow Uber on Market Street!

Allow Uber on Market Street! — sign the petition today!

petition.uber.org/sf/

Share Link
Posted Jun 11, 2015
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Dan

From Lyft:

The California Senate is voting on AB 612 and 2293, two bills that stifle ridesharing with burdensome regulations. Email your state senator, and key senators, to let them know they should vote NO.

WHY ASK YOUR SENATOR TO VOTE NO:
1. They're anti-competitive: Both bills create an unequal regulatory burden that disadvantages ridesharing platforms to protect existing industries, with no basis in facts. AB 2293 would require TNCs to have insurance limits three times as high as LA cabs and 30 times higher than everyday California drivers.

2. They're unnecessary: The California Public Utilities Commission created a TNC framework that has served as a model across the nation because it was specifically designed for ridesharing. Both bills undermine the CPUC's rules.

3. They don't increase public safety: TNCs offer unique safety protocols not present in traditional services, including real-time ratings, GPS tracking, and identity verification. These bills ignore those benefits while forcing TNCs to adopt taxi-like driver requirements. Both bills will reduce access to ridesharing without increasing public safety.

Share Link
Posted Aug 21, 2014
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Dan

The SFMTA Board is voting on the proposed SF Carsharing Pilot Project tomorrow. We need your support.

The two-year project, which will include Getaround, City Carshare, and Zipcar, will dedicate approximately 900 on-street parking spots across the city for carshare vehicles. The pilot aims to accommodate the growing popularity of carsharing services in San Francisco and make carsharing a real alternative to car ownership in every neighborhood across San Francisco. In doing so, it also stands to improve San Francisco's local economy, traffic congestion, and environment by eliminating over 10,000 cars in San Francisco. But the project isn't a sure thing so we need your help.

Please sign this petition (secure.peers.org/page/signup/c...) and join sf.citi, Getaround, & Peers at 12:15 tomorrow at The Grove (301 Hayes Street). Coffee is on Getaround and then we will head over to City Hall together as a group. The SFMTA Board meeting is 1:00 PM at City Hall, Room 400.

Share Link
Posted Jul 14, 2014
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Eckhart Beatty

Members of the collaborative community in the mobility space should band together to provide services that are conducive to reduction in vehicle mileage overall. For example, a scooter organization could band together with a car company, or a semi-electric bike service might partner with another car sharing service. They all belong in the ecosystem and could occupy niches.
Regardless how alliances build out, people should commit to challenges in order to reduce their car mileage by biking and walking more. Car-pooling has its place, as well.

Share Link
Posted Oct 17, 2013
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Tom K.

San Francisco Supervisor Scott Wiener said there are times when existing public transit is not enough, "and that's where shared mobility really comes into play."

The challenge for government regulators, he said, is "to make sure that instead of having a knee-jerk reaction" to shut down the new business models "that we're actually trying to work with this innovation and find a way to allow it to move forward."

www.sfgate.com/business/articl...

Share Link
Posted Oct 14, 2013
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.