Dan
I co-founded Neighborland with Candy Chang and Tee Parham. Our mission is to help people shape the development of their neighborhoods. 
Dan on Twitter    http://www.danparham.com   

Recent Activity

Dan

From Motivate:

We’re growing and adding more locations, but we can’t do it without your help. Join us for our next series of workshops to have your say in where new bike sharing locations will end up in your neighborhood.

Workshop schedules: www.bayareabikeshare.com/expan...
Proposed expansion sites (Mission, Castro, Mission Bay, Soma, FiDi): www.bayareabikeshare.com/asset...
Share your insights online: suggest.bayareabikeshare.com/p...

Thumb5142e9b9ca7c37f046d521c147517e97

Introducing Bay Area Bike Share, your new regional transit system

Access to shared bicycles will be available 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week in San Francisco, Redwood City, Palo Alto, Mountain View, and San Jose

www.bayareabikeshare.com/expan...

Share Link
Posted Jun 23, 2016
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Dan

Some insights from a project in Sonoma County -

"It’s technically legal to build a permanent Accessory Dwelling Unit on a proper foundation, but the cost of compliance with endless regulations was ridiculous. A permit is $24,000. There’s an obligation to rip up the street and trench a completely redundant sewer line (minimum $15,000) instead of just tapping the existing sewer from the main house. The code requires fire sprinklers that will come in at about $10,000. The requirement for off-street covered parking means building a garage larger than the cottage itself. Then there’s the internal conflict of many of the codes. Permeable pavement is required for storm water runoff control, but that runoff is caused by the required added driveway and garage. Meanwhile a plain vanilla gravel parking space in the front yard is forbidden.

The list is absolutely endless and only a professional architect along with a consulting engineer can possibly understand the entitlement process and all the code minutiae, so factor in those billable hours as well. At the end of the day even a very modest backyard cottage was completely off the table for me. I will not go in to that kind of debt and I won’t tolerate charging the required high rent to service the loan. It’s a lose/lose proposition all around. No thank you."

www.strongtowns.org/journal/20...

Thumbb783153b164163dd72eb7e5ad8179193

Affordable Housing That Might Have Been

My attempts to build a tiny home have been thwarted by a hostile regulatory
environment at every turn. So here's what I did instead.

www.strongtowns.org/journal/20...

Share Link
Posted Jun 20, 2016
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Dan

SF supervisors compromise on plan for 6 new homeless shelters:

m.sfgate.com/politics/article/...

Thumbe33cf0a3b65e975ab4fec7743f3f8080

SF supervisors compromise on plan for 6 new homeless shelters

San Francisco supervisors unanimously passed a plan Tuesday to open a half dozen innovative homeless shelters in the city, after requirements for centers where alcoholics could drink and drug users could legally shoot up were put on the back burner. Supervisor David Campos helped clear the way for passage when he amended his homeless shelter...

www.sfgate.com/politics/articl...

Share Link
Posted Jun 20, 2016
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Dan

Interesting proposal from Greg Ferenstein -

The general strategy is to allow San Francisco to build a lot more apartments. There are 4 components to the law:

1. Enact “as-of-right” zoning, which prohibits neighborhood interest groups from dramatically delaying any project they don’t like through bureaucratic regulatory processes (construction can take 8–10 years to approve in San Francisco, compared to a similar process that takes just 17 weeks in Seattle).

2. End density regulations — much of San Francisco effectively prohibits anything but 2-story single family homes [pdf].

3. Raise height limits in each neighborhood.

4. Ensure each new building creates the maximum number of affordable units for residents making less than the median income. Generally speaking, more construction means a higher percent of subsidized apartments for those making the median income or less. For instance, Seattle’s Mayor put forth a plan to build roughly 4 times more affordable units than San Francisco (40,000) — a plan made possible thanks to Seattle’s famous commitment to density.

medium.com/@ferenstein/san-fra...

Thumb8cc82f60d589024be6924aa617bbd246

San Francisco’s Housing Crisis Is Solvable With One Law. Here’s How You Can Help

Summary and quick actions (details below) ¶

It is possible to solve the affordable housing crisis through a law that allows San Francisco to build many mo…

medium.com/@ferenstein/san-fra...

Share Link
Posted Jun 16, 2016
Sign in or sign up to add a reply.
Dan
Dan
Jun 16, 2016
Dan proposed this event for Project Homeless Connect.

Board of Supervisors Hearing on our City's Homelessness Services
Friday, June 17, 2016, 1:00pm - 4pm
City Hall, Legislative Chamber, Room 250

The City spends nearly $250 million from our general fund each year on homelessness services, and that number continues to grow. Yet, our homeless count has virtually stayed the same, and the dire situation on our streets has only gotten worse.

Join us as we learn what exactly we are spending these funds on, what is working, and what is not. We'll also discuss plans for the new Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, and hear recommendations from the Budget and Legislative Analyst on how we can improve our approach to addressing homelessness and maximize our spending.

Note that you can also watch online: sfgovtv.org/

Sign in or sign up to add a reply.